<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plan Orange. Burn the Skunk. Immolate Mortgage Crisis. A Guide to 4 Stories and 3 Charts on the King Kong Debt-Killer.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://housingstory.net/2009/07/02/burn-the-skunk-plan-orange-immolates-mortgage-crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://housingstory.net/2009/07/02/burn-the-skunk-plan-orange-immolates-mortgage-crisis/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:10:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael David White</title>
		<link>http://housingstory.net/2009/07/02/burn-the-skunk-plan-orange-immolates-mortgage-crisis/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael David White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 03:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewmortgagecompany.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>Hi Wade, the premise behind plan orange which says debt must be systematically destroyed following a credit bubble is correct. the premise which says it should be paid for with government money i think now is incorrect. debt destruction should be paid for by the owners of the debt.  i wholly agree with you about all of the valuable lessons which we can learn from the failure and diminished material wealth we are now experiencing. thanks very much for your comment. mdw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Wade, the premise behind plan orange which says debt must be systematically destroyed following a credit bubble is correct. the premise which says it should be paid for with government money i think now is incorrect. debt destruction should be paid for by the owners of the debt.  i wholly agree with you about all of the valuable lessons which we can learn from the failure and diminished material wealth we are now experiencing. thanks very much for your comment. mdw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
